THE AEDARSA ADVISOR
December 4, 2002
To Building Design Architects and Elevator Contractors in Alberta Our files: 5739-1-1 AEDARSA Edmonton AEDARSA Calgary 207, 8616 - 51 Avenue 209, 264 Midpark Way SE Edmonton AB T6E 6E6 Calgary, AB T2X 1J6 Ph: (780) 448 0184 Fax: (780) 448 0237 Ph: (403) 216 5750 Fax: (403) 216 5755 |
Subject
Pending Adoption of CSA-B44-00 Safety Code For Elevators
Elevator Hoistway/Building Designs for the Near Future
BACKGROUND
We expect that the new B44-00 code will be declared in force in Alberta by around April of 2003. A new requirement has been introduced in this code that may impact on building designs.
Clauses 2.14 and 3.1 of the code require standard railings (minimum 1070 mm / 42 in. high) to be installed on all sides of all elevator car tops where the distances between the edges of the car top and the adjacent hoistway enclosure exceeds 300 mm (12 in.). This new requirement is mainly in the interest of elevator worker safety.
POSSIBLE IMPACT ON FUTURE BUILDING DESIGNS
Building designers should consider that for buildings where elevators my be purchased in the near future, hoistways for elevators sold after the code is declared in force may have to be designed with higher ceilings than before to accommodate the above mentioned railings. In some cases overall building height may also be affected.
The new requirement will probably mostly affect building designs that incorporate hydraulic elevators since building roof structures are used for hoistway ceilings for most hydraulic elevators. However, building designs incorporating traction elevators may also be effected.
Note: Other overhead clearance requirements for elevators basically have not changed from the previous (1994) edition of code. They do however vary depending on the rated speed of elevators and if they’re equipped with electric or hydraulic drives and if they are equipped with counterweights.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Building designers should work closely with elevator suppliers/installers early in building design stages to ensure this new requirement is properly addressed.
|